Chuck Lorre - Hmm, Never Mind?

(Edited).

Let me just start by saying I haven't read his book myself - and I don't think I'm going to, considering the fallout that's occurred since its release this past week.

So last week, I had written a post about CBS's odd moves in general lately, which included his hilarious clapback to Trump, after Lorre's non-publicly-televised speech that the White House apparently heard about, commented publicly on, and then Chuck Lorre clapped back.

(Although admittedly, his original non-publicly-televised speech was a bit crude and I don't think wishing anyone to die is EVER okay, but the rest was funny.)

This week, however, Lorre's new memoir came out called "Sitcom" - and it has me changing my tune about him.

Okay, so - we all knew Charlie Sheen was/is an A-hole, partly caused by substance abuse and partly because he's just an a-hole with a huge ego. 

We knew this because many of his antics played out in public for the world to see on film, including antisemitic rants - we couldn't help but see it.

We also know that Chuck Lorre finally fired him from Two-And-A-Half Men after several chances to get clean and sober and be more respectful of himself and his castmates. 

However, at the same time, Chuck knew what he was getting into when he hired Charlie Sheen already, right?

I also wondered at the time why Chuck Lorre let Charlie get under his skin so much, how he could push his anger buttons so easily, such that it spilled out so publicly, when others just quietly either refused to hire him/fire him.

I speculated that there was alcoholism around him already somewhere, such that it had this deep of an emotional effect on him.

I mean, I know myself that there are certain personalities that I avoid because I will "trigger" if I'm around them too long, so I get it.

And his new book reveals it, but only to a point - he doesn't appear to have any true insight into that yet or what that's really about.

Hold that thought for a moment, though.

First, let's talk about what famous people should and should not talk about in either interviews or a memoir book. 

Talking about his side of the public feud with Sheen is fine - it was already public and he deserves to tell his side.

Talking about your side of a story that hasn't been heard is fine - as long as you're not just dissing other people in  the business that you just don't like (which he borders on doing in his book).

Talking about how somebody screwed you over when you were coming up can be okay - *IF* - you're calling out power abuse or predatory behavior in Hollywood.

Then there's a couple of things you should NEVER do in a memoir regarding still living/working people in the business: 

- You do not out someone's sexuality.

- You do not out someone's private substance abuse struggles that they have not disclosed themselves publicly -  ESPECIALLY if they have said nothing negative to or about YOU (which Sheen did, but the others I'm about to discuss that he just dissed - have not).

- You do not diss someone else's lack of talent from your own opinion.

 

You *ESPECIALLY* should never do the above if you're in a greater position of power than the people you're dissing - like a producer, director, filmmaker or multi-sitcom creator - because it destroys careers (and likely the person themselves, already struggling.)

For example, Quentin Tarantino calling out Paul Dano as being a terrible actor in Django Unchained was cruel and unnecessary - and fellow actors flocked to defend him and Tarantino ended up looking like the huge power-drunk a-hole he has become.

(Paul Dano can play some really good psycho creepers, though.)

Sometimes people just aren't right for a certain role, but they do great in other roles - and it doesn't mean they're a terrible actor overall.

Other actors aren't so great, but we love them anyway and they work great in action movies (Keanu Reeves).

Even the best actors have taken on some roles they couldn't deliver on, they were just miscast.

There are a few directors that have said "I don't think we'll be working together again," which is fine - it leaves it with the idea it wasn't a good fit between them.

In particular, Chuck Lorre calling out Anna Faris on "Mom" - a show which ran for 7 years (which I never watched, btw) for her private substance use and actually leaving the show because of it rather than "pursue other projects"  as was publicly stated. 

He also went onto say her doing so proved him right about his reluctance to hire her.

(After several years on the show?)

Most of us had no idea she had substance abuse issues!

I mean, we did wonder because sometimes she acted loopy on interviews, but some actors are just loopy, with or without substance use lol.

Now, just know that I have no feelings or opinions about Anna Faris,  other than I found her hilarious in "Just Friends" and the Scary Movie franchise - but what he just did was NOT cool.

I get it that after Charlie Sheen, you'd be wary of ever hiring anyone else with substance issues.

But then again - Anna Faris is no Charlie Sheen.

We're not dealing with a Hollywood legacy dynasty like the Sheen family.

We never saw or heard about HER throwing public tantrums and shouting antisemitic rants at castmates, refusing to show up for work- because apparently, she didn't.

And the fact that she wasn't like Sheen at all is proven by the fact that all of her castmates have rallied around her after this public  diss on social media, saying they loved her and every minute they spent with her on the show.

(That is something Charlie Sheen's castmates did NOT ever do for him - they were glad to see him go!)

In fact, the public at large didn't even know Anna had substance abuse issues until you just told us!

To her credit, Anna has responded by saying she "didn't see this coming" and "can't pretend she's not hurt," and also that she has been "sober for a year-and-a-half now," and then actually expressed gratitude to him and everyone involved with the show for her time there. 

Can't think of a better way to respond to that, go Anna!

Also, Mayim Bialik, from The Big Bang Theory, has just publicly said it was difficult time working with Chuck himself during that feud with Charlie.

Chuck - take note of Mayim's compassion and mercy towards you - are you giving others as much compassion and mercy as Mayim is showing YOU, right now? 

Then we discover that Chuck Lorre was an alcoholic himself, sober for many years now.

Aha - now we have a bit more insight into why he'd ever out Anna's  private substance abuse issues -  because he's never learned to forgive himself or have compassion for himself for his prior alcoholism - and thus has no patience or tolerance for anyone actively using.

Also, alcoholism is NOT just about drinking - it comes with a whole set of other behaviors that need to be addressed including boundary issues, abandonment issues, and unlearned coping skills; thus, just because you quit drinking doesn't necessarily mean you don't have other stuff going on that needs work.

Then he supposedly goes on to diss Cybil Shepard, on the show Cybil in the 90s.

He say she wanted "total creative control." 

Cybil has famously said she DID want "more" creative control, but but not total control - and I mean, she has a point - the show WAS named after her and her experiences - shouldn't she have a say?

Regardless, why you dragging these actresses from years ago through the mud, Chuck?

As IF actresses already don't have a hard enough time in Hollywood?

In fact, wasn't that what the show "Cybil" was about, how aging  actresses are treated in Hollywood?

Plus, you DO seem to have a hard time writing female characters - perhaps you could use the feedback?

Oh, I see - he says he's been married 3 times and has issues with his mother - NOW we get it - he has no clue about women. 😂

Dude - perhaps you shouldn't write women until you understand them better and actually listen to them?

Then he tells this story about how the execs wanted him to cast a "hot, young, thin" actress in a fat suit for Mike and Molly (!) instead of Melissa McCarthy, but he stood his ground, saying she was a once-in-a-lifetime talent.

I guess we're all supposed to applaud him for that, but on the heels of the other stuff he's said about actresses, it falls a bit flat. 

So ... maybe no, on Chuck Lorre, after all.

Though never an alcoholic/addict (other than cigarettes), I was married to one previously, and I DO still have compassion for addicts and alcoholics.

And I do get refusing to enable them - that's not love or compassion, that's enabling. Sometimes with addicts/alcoholics, you have to love them with boundaries or from afar, to keep everyone safe.

However, when former addicts/alcoholics have no compassion or mercy at all for others still using, it reminds me of the parable of the merciless servant in the bible ... just ... ewwww.

(This behavior also goes against the 12 steps, proving Chuck has not had nearly enough treatment.)

So Chuck Lorre? 

Dude, you're in a more powerful position than everyone you just outed/dissed that unlike Sheen, had never said a bad word to or about you - potentially destroying their careers. 

What then separates your particular brand of power abuse from Trump, whom you just shot down a week ago?

Methinks you should go back to picking on MEN your own (ego?) size - women in Hollywood have enough critics already!!!

MRI Results and New Appointment List

 

The MRI results are back. 

Here's a screen shot ... 

In case you have trouble reading these, allow me to interpret 😂 

"Dextrocurvature" of the spine means (adult) scoliosis towards the right, which I already knew about. 

(Other imaging has stated it's both mid and lumbar spine and mild to moderate, but this particular imaging position only scanned lumbar area.

I have an acute/subacute L1 (lumbar or lower back) vertebral compression fracture resulting in 40% height loss, with surrounding acute/subacute edema indicating an acute/subacute event. 

The words "acute/subacute" on both the fracture and the surrounding edema are definitive proof the fracture is a result of the accident alone. 

(We also have a DEXA scan scheduled to rule out osteoporosis at play, but at this point, even if I do have osteoporosis, the above wording on the MRI scan would still prove the fracture was caused by accident, just exacerbating an underlying condition at most.)

I also have 2 disc compressions at L4-L5 and L5-S1, which are old and I did NOT know about.

(I just thought I had muscle spasms there due to scoliosis, and as I've said, I'm good with physical pain, so I had no idea)

Disc-space narrowing more towards one side than the other means the discs are compressed. "Desiccation" means the discs are "drying" or have lost fluid as a result. (The discs between your vertebrae are essentially your shock absorbers).

We know they are old because of the presence of osteophyte formation near them.

(Osteophytes are your body's way of compensating for disc-space height loss and develop over time; thus, how we know they are old and NOT a result of the accident.)

The disc compressions are likely the result of scoliosis rather than the accident.

The "spondylosis" mentioned - or "abnormal spine" is likely the result of the osteophyte formation and scoliosis as well. 

This does NOT mean I'm not experiencing pain there as a result of the accident, I certainly am - the accident aggravated this area.

The good news is, NONE of this will require surgery!

Otherwise, a few people have asked for my appointment list to send prayers or good vibes or just to know.

A few more were just added.

They are:

OCTOBER:

Tuesday, October 20th, 9:40 a.m. - PCP to investigate the new upper rib pain - there may be imaging involved.

Wednesday, October 21st, 7:40 a.m. - DEXA scan. This is a bone density test to help prove the fractures were not a result of bone density loss or osteoporosis. (Even if I do have osteoporosis, it would make no difference after the MRI result proving the accident caused the fracture; if anything, it would only help my case that it caused a fracture already having a bone condition).

Tuesday, October 27th, 10 a.m. - follow-up visit with Neurosurgery after scanning results.

Thursday, October 29th, 8:00  - follow-up visit with Orthopedics to check wrist fracture and ankle sprain, also to check new hip and shoulder pain.

NOVEMBER:

November 17th, 1:30 p.m. - Cardiothoracic/Vascular Surgery to investigate whether true aortic mural thrombus or simple plaque build-up - and if it is a true thrombus, whether or not it was caused or worsened by the accident.

That's all for now, Folks!

 

 

Trump's Plans to Renovate Potomac Links Public Golf Course in D.C.

 

Gas is $4.35 a gallon, utilities are through the roof, and you can't go to the grocery store for even 3 or simple items without spending at least $50 - and all Trump cares about is using our tax money to put his name on stuff, tear down and rebuild the White House into a ballroom, spruce up public golf courses - and worst of all, fund his own campaign commercials? 

(Although a federal judge put a stop to that last one, though he'll likely appeal.

Now look - I know that the president cannot control gas prices - or the prices of anything - without price control which would be true socialism, if not communism.

But at the same time, the reason gas prices are high is because of that damn attack on Iran, which he had no plan for and never should've done. 

Most of us can hardly make ends meet, right now, but all he is worried about care about golf courses, White House ballrooms, and a Triumphal arch in DC, like he's Marie Antoinette, saying "Let Them Eat Cake" - with our tax money!!!

Now you all know that if Obama and Biden had done annnnyyyyy of that, you all would've gone nuts. 

In fact, can you even remember why you hated Obama and Biden so much?

I doubt it.

(And don't say Epstein stuff because clearly, Trump isn't tackling that either, and unlike Trump their Obama and Biden's name never appeared in any photos or guest lists with Epstein - and some say the whole Iran thing was a distraction from it.)

Also don't say COVID because cases have gone down and/or are less severe since vaccines, and you're still alive, aren't you?

You Republicans are supposed to be the party of small government and small spending - hellllooo?

But when it's someone from your party having a field day with our tax money on frivolous stuff, while we can't even afford gas or groceries, you turn a blind eye to it. 

Some of you voted for Trump simply based on the economy and now seeing it's worse and have changed your tune.

Others STILL don't see any problems with Trump yet.

Sigh. Okay, guess we'll have to wait until you finally see it. 

Some of you never will, I guess, in true cult mentality.

(Regardless, I really hope there's some good cult deprogramming therapists out there on standby lol.)

Trump, if you want this frivolous stuff done for your own glory, then pay for it your DANG self - or get one of your bitcoin fraudsters that you pardoned to pay for it for you! 😂

Small Setback, Appointments This Week

 Good moring, all!

So I'm not sure what's going on, but starting Thursday, my back started hurting again, but more interestingly, my left upper ribs. 

So we know there was an 11th rib fracture, but no others were mentioned; however, with the extensive soft-tissue swelling I had (also mentioned on scans), it was difficult to tell.

The strange thing about car accidents is that things can show up even weeks later. 

Thus, I've spent the last 2 days with the full brace on, lying flat in bed again.

Argh, frustrating! I thought I was better!

As mentioned, I'm good with pain, unless it goes on to long, then I start to get impatient and frustrated - but I reckon I'll live, as my grandma used to say with things that weren't life threatening. 😂

In fact, I rode the stationary bike on Wednesday and also tried to fall decorate a little bit.

Oops, that may be the problem?

However, if so, I actually don't think it was the stationary bike - I think it was trying to decorate, bending and leaning over a bit to work on my wreaths.

I realized about an hour into it things were starting to hurt a little, so I stopped.

But Friday and especially yesterday, it started to hurt almost as bad as that first week.

MUCH better today, though, after wearing my brace.

My wreaths are spread out here and there, though, such that it looks like a pumpkin threw up in here. 😂

Anyway, some people have asked about my appointments this week.

They are:

Today (yes, Sunday) - 9:45 a.m. - lumbar MRI. (This will only show the lumbar spine where the fracture is, not ribs. It also will illuminate more on the aortic mural thrombus.

Tuesday - 9:40 a.m. - PCP to investigate new upper left rib pain.

Wednesday - 7:40 a.m. - DEXA scan - this is a bone density scan to prove that the vertebral fracture was not caused by postmenopausal osteoporosis and thus only caused by the accident alone. 

Other than that,  all good, except I'm getting stressed about finances. Everything is so ungodly expensive, right now, and of course, I can't DoorDash anymore to help.

But I'm trying to stay positive and forward-thinking, right?

That's the only way through.

I keep thinking it could've been worse and this WILL heal in time, right?

(Say yes here 😂.)

PS - New Department of War Logo: Wait, Is That a Nazi Eagle?

 

So the Department of Defense - erm - I mean Department of War, quietly released their new logo in recent weeks.

The eagle is larger and the wings are more angular. 

Um - that's a little too close to the Nazi eagle for comfort for me - anyone else?

Here's the Nazi version ...

As IF we needed more proof that our country is turning into a fascist dictatorship - and that our own people are actually voting for it - although they don't necessarily realize that are, as it comes wrapped in "Christian" nationalist disguise.

Speaking of which, Christian values and Nazi values should be incompatible - the words of Christ and Nazi philosophy are in direct opposition to one another.

However, as the quote loosely attributed to Sinclair Lewis says, "When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross”

I say "loosely" because this phrase was never actually written or spoken by Sinclair Lewis - but he later noted he agreed with it.

Sinclair Lewis was more interested in fascism coming under the guises of enslavement to "laissez faire" ("hands-off" or unchecked) capitalism than religion - although he does lightly touch on misusing Christianity to manipulate voters to it.

In his book, "It Can't Happen Here," Lewis said: 

"But he saw too that in America the struggle was befogged by the fact that the worst Fascists were they who disowned the word 'Fascism' and preached enslavement to Capitalism under the style of Constitutional and Traditional Native American Liberty."

The closest to this quote was actually said by James Waterman Wise Jr in a speech reported in the magazine Christian Century on February 5, 1936, he stated that if fascism came to America, "it will probably be 'wrapped up in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty and preservation of the constitution.'

Translation?

Exactly what I've said before -  the smellers are the fellers! 😂

Whether extreme right (fascists) or extreme left (communists), they are two sides of the same government control coin. 

Either way, the song remains the same (only MAGA/Trump defies the constitution themselves, while still feigning adherence to it.)

Despite Hegseth's Combat Fitness Test Designed for Women to Fail, 91% of Marine Women Passed

 

First of all, let me just start by saying that I don't know why men OR women would want to be in combat roles under this current administration, but if that's your thing, go for it, I guess.

Let me also say that considering our Secretary of War (cue rock intro), Pete Hegseth's very public commentary about changing the rules on handling sexual assault complaints (making them harder to file and easier to dismiss) - I also don't know why women would want to be outnumbered by that many men with no protection at all under Hegseth's new sexual assault rules, heavily favoring the perpetrators rather than the victims.

I mean, look at what happened at a Cornell frat, and they're not even jacked-up military.

(Speaking of which, super proud of you men for being publicly vocal on this one against the Cornell 7, standing alongside us - and I'm sorry that Hegseth didn't get the memo.)

Nevertheless, I guess some women want to challenge themselves in a military way.

Speaking of (aging) frat boys, note that despite the clip included in this video of Hegseth saying "War does not care if you're a man or a woman" in the below video, he designed the test to be harder for women - heavier on upper body strength - so they couldn't pass it.

(FYI, he also took women and people of color off the promotions list.)

But guess what?

91% of them passed - with 96% of the men passing.

In fact, the reporter herself from this segment passed it with flying colors!

He also said, during his famous speech at Quantico - the one where they threatened national security and ongoing missions by calling in all generals from around the world to hear it in person - stating "No fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals. Just warriors"

Oh, BTW, Aging Frat Boy - you're dang right to say war doesn't care if you're a man or a woman ...

... but it also doesn't care if you're gay or trans, black, white, brown, or purple, whether or not you have a beard,  whether you're Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or atheist, nor what your personal politics actually are, either.

But Hegseth likes things in neat little boxes with labels, despite no one neatly fitting in them -  including himself.

Because as for Hegseth passing the physical fitness test himself?

Bzzzz ... that's a fail.

And we ladies - and the internet - took notice 😂

Ah-hahahahaha! 😂😂😂

Pttthhhhbttt ... you suuuuck!

Dude - lay off the booze and blow - even the girls passed you! 😂

Sigh, yet another example of Republican hypocrisy - envisioning a fantasy world of perfect standards that even they, themselves, cannot uphold -  and instead of just admitting they can't, they continue to pretend they are in fantasy.

Also, what men like Hegseth don't understand about women is, we also like to challenge ourselves in different ways - and some women enjoy doing that through physical workouts too!

(NOT talking about myself, of course. 😂 I do try to stay active, but not a super workouter. Although after being injured, I will say it makes me more determined than usual about getting stronger.)

Six Flags Over Georgia Accident - Plus - "Class Action Park" and Other Amusement Parks in the 80s and 90s.

 

*Edited for typos, links added.

So as mentioned in my first post yesterday, I was already going to write a post about a documentary I watched over this rainy weekend on HBO Max called "Class Action Park" - the most dangerous amusement park in U.S. history.

I mean, I'm surprised we 80s and 90s kids survived any of these amusement parks and water parks, because there were virtually no safety regulations followed or checked!

However, despite improved safety conditions and checked, accidents can still happen.

Because on Monday, a man was ejected from the train of the Goliath roller coaster and was killed. Six Flags has closed  9  similar rides throughout the US as a precaution.

So I grew up about 20 minutes from Kings Island in Cincinnati and I had a season pass. As a child, I was terrified of roller coasters and didn't ride them, but loved them as a young adult and adult.

(FYI - Kings Island is now owned by Six Flags as of 2024).

I remember there were virtually no safety features anywhere, and if there were, the 16-year-olds  - many of whom were my friends and classmates - were running the rides and never checked to see if they were latched properly back then. They were too busy hanging out, flirting, and having a great time! 😂

Ah, 80s kids, the "latchkey" generation with little supervision - assuming everything and everyone was safe, though it so was NOT!

The biggest problem, however, is that at that time, they sold unlimited beer and liquor at Kings Island - which of course resulted in a plethora of accidents over time, such that they stopped selling it for a time, but they do again now, and I'm just waiting for another accident to happen.

I remember an incident in 1982 on Grad Night, a drunken kid tried to ride atop the elevator on the Eiffel Tower and was killed.  Later, another woman passed out drunk on a ride and was so lax, she slipped right through the bars. And in 1989, someone drunk fell in the water pond and was electrocuted, as was the security guard who tried to save him, due to an open electrical wire in the pond. Then, of course, The Bat was shut down due to multiple injuries, just being a rough ride.

Even by the time my daughter was born, though safety had vastly improved, there were still issues at times - just not as many - and more importantly, no one died.

In fact, true story - on July 9, 2006, my exhusband, myself, and his son and my daughter all went to Kings Island. At that time Paramount Studios had bought it and renamed many of the rides after movies and it was generally considered safer.

My ex wanted to ride "Son of Beast" that day.

(This was one of the rides Paramount kept "as is" instead of renaming it, as they did the original "The Beast.")

Although I loved the original The Beast, there was something about the angles on Son of Beast I didn't like, so despite loving roller coasters, I never rode it.

My ex and his son were heading out after lunch to ride it.

Of course, I wasn't going to ride it, and my daughter was wary of it already, too, so we were going to do something else.

However, I got a chill and said "Please don't ride that today, okay? I'm telling you, something bad is going to happen. Promise me you and K won't ride it. I don't think he's tall enough anyway yet."

At first, he laughed, but at the time, he also knew that when I got that sense that strong, to listen to it.

So they didn't -- (at least I don't think they did) - but sure enough, not long after I said that, Son of Beast had an accident injuring 27 people!

We suddenly heard sirens and saw ambulances driving through the park, and when we asked people what happened, they said they shut the ride down, multiple injuries.

My ex-husband turned to me, white as a sheet - "OMG, it WAS that sense you get sometimes!"

A cracked wooden support beam and fractured vertical members in the Rose Bowl (the large elevated helix) caused a 5-inch sag in the track structure. As a result, the train slammed into this damaged section at high speed and riders experienced a severe "pothole effect," comparable to hitting a brick wall.

The ride never reopened. 

(I don't get "senses" like that as much as I used to, not in years, with the exception of my own car accident a month ago. However, I had no idea it was going to be a car crash - just that "something bad is about to happen, but it's going to be okay." First one I've had in literally years.)

Back to the safety of the rides in the 80s and 90s (or the lack thereof), Mark and I just watched a documentary called "Class Action Park" on HBO Max this past weekend.

It's about the most infamous amusement and water park of all time, "Action Park" in northern New Vernon, New Jersey.

So of course I can't share the full documentary here, but here are the highlights - narrated by former teen employees, some of whom are now comedians - so it's both hilarious and disturbing!

I mean, you're laughing because it's so "no rules, anything goes" and crazy unsafe rides - but also horrified.

And the thing was, if you didn't come back to school in the Fall with a battle scar from Action Park, then you weren't "tough" enough. 😂

Now - some of these rides shown in the video don't seem that bad because we have safer versions today (we hope), so in that way, many of these things were ahead of their time, only no one cared or even checked for safety.

Others should've never existed in the first place for humans or any living creature! 😂

This video clip doesn't even cover it, you have to see the full documentary to get it - drunken people setting stuff on fire or  trying to jump their boats over other boats, but landing instead on people's heads, chasing employees down in the race cars - we're talking full-on anarchy chaos! 

While watching it, I said to Mark "Yeah, so ...  you and your brother, S, would've been all about this park, growing up, had it been near Detroit, wouldn't you?"  😂

Like I said, you really have to see the full documentary to get a full picture of how dangerous it actually was - there were at least 7 known fatalities from this park in and a plethora of other injuries, some of them permanently disabling!

So why - and how did this go on so long without anyone shutting it down?

That's a good question - here's what went wrong.

For starters, the park's creator, Gene Mulvihill, took funding for the park from disgraced Wall Street trader, Bob Brennan, who was banned from Wall Street for selling penny junk stocks and bonds.

(I mean, how sociopathic do you have to be to get kicked off Wall Street in the 1980s, I ask you? 😂)

Both men were nearly of an anarchist mindset, believing in no rules and total freedom, no government intervention.

1).  Instead of hiring actual engineers to design and build the rides, to save money, they took any Joe Schmoe off the street to design and build the rides. 

2) No one would insure him, so Gene created his own fake insurance company in the Cayman Islands  which didn't exist.

3) They only had to report to the state "serious" injuries, but left the word "serious" up to park interpretation.

4) The park performed no safety inspections themselves at all. They did have state safety inspections, Gene often gave lavish gifts to the community, particularly lawmakers, so nothing was ever cited or done. The park also brought in tons of tourist income to the tiny rural city of New Vernon, New Jersey, so many looked the other way.

5)  All attraction employees were under the age of 18 and often went off leaving rides unsupervised or did nothing to help people struggling - especially at the waterpark

6). With lawsuits, Gene never settled and would drag out cases until they went to court, so none of them were ever settled or resolved - and in fact, one of the fatalities was blamed on a rock in the park the kid's head hit, rather than the ride itself he was thrown from! (This despite the state safety inspection previously ordering them to remove the rocks.) Thus, Gene - and his fake insurance company -  never paid a dime to the families of the dead or permanently disabled.

7). They sold alcohol without ever checking IDs or putting a limit on clearly inebriated patrons.

8) Gene never paid state or federal taxes, which went on for years, until finally he went to prison for 10 years for tax evasion, insurance fraud, and money laundering - but never for the fatalities or injuries that occured at his park.

Ah, white-collar crime that "harm's no one" (but actually harms the most amount of people) - Trump's favorite!

Speaking of Trump, he very nearly invested in Action Park himself, but pulled out at the last minute after a fatality had just occurred.

Once again - how sociopathic and fraudulent do you have to be, such that Trump won't even invest in it? 😂

And I thought Kings Island was bad!

Good Lord, how in the heck did we survive this stuff in the 80s?  😂

See, this is why we need a good balance between government oversight (for health and safety, consumer protection, and justice that preferably money can't buy you out of) VS. capitalism - when either side goes unchecked for too long and wields too much power, we have major issues!

For the rest, watch the documentary!